Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2

Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI and GLM-5.2 from Z.ai are shown side by side so you can compare pricing, model IDs, context and output limits, modalities, tool use, release details, and benchmark results where data is available.

Overall Recommendation

Kimi K3 is the broader default because it adds image and video input and has published TokenHub benchmark results. Choose GLM-5.2 for text-only engineering when roughly 60% lower input cost and 72% lower output cost matter more; TokenHub currently has no GLM-5.2 benchmark data for a capability verdict.

Comparison Highlights

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
GLM-5.2Z.ai
Best For
Multimodal creationvaried agent workflows
Long-horizon engineeringrepository-scale work
How To Read ItUse-case synthesis from model capabilities and positioning.
Workload Fit
MultimodalCreationGeneral agents
EngineeringLong contextDeveloper agents
How To Read ItThe workloads each model is most directly shaped for.
Input
$2.8571/M
$1.1429/MEdge
How To Read ItLower is better when prompts or retrieval payloads are large.
Output
$14.2857/M
$4/MEdge
How To Read ItLower is better for reasoning-heavy or long-generation traffic.
Context length
1M
1M
How To Read ItHigher is better for repositories, retrieval packs, and transcripts.
Input modalities
Text, ImageEdge
Text
How To Read ItBroader input support reduces the need for separate vision or video models.

Model Selection Guide

Kimi K3Moonshot AI

Choose Kimi K3 When

  • Text, image, and video input, while GLM-5.2 is text-only
  • Published Intelligence and Coding Index results are available on TokenHub
  • One model can cover both visual creation and technical agents
GLM-5.2Z.ai

Choose GLM-5.2 When

  • $1.1429 input and $4 output per million tokens, versus $2.8571 and $14.2857
  • The same 1M-class context and 131.1K maximum output as Kimi K3
  • Positioned for long-horizon, repository-scale engineering workflows

Basic Information

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
GLM-5.2Z.ai

Name

Kimi K3Kimi K3

Model id

Kimi K3kimi-k3

Intro

Kimi K3Kimi K3 is a high-performance AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, and complex task execution. It delivers strong performance on large-scale programming projects, multi-step problem solving, and knowledge-intensive applications. With broad context handling and multimodal capabilities, K3 is suitable for building powerful AI agents, developer tools, and enterprise-level applications.

Author

Kimi K3Moonshot AI

Released date

Kimi K32026-07-16

Context length

Kimi K31M

Max output tokens

Kimi K3131.1K

Name

GLM-5.2GLM-5.2

Model id

GLM-5.2glm-5.2

Intro

GLM-5.2GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship foundation model for long-horizon engineering tasks. It emphasizes a usable 1M-token context window for project-scale code and system context, more stable execution on long tasks, and better adherence to engineering standards. It is positioned for full development workflows, from requirements and repository analysis to implementation, testing, and multi-platform deployment, where large context and sustained agent behavior matter.

Author

GLM-5.2Z.ai

Released date

GLM-5.22026-06-13

Context length

GLM-5.21M

Max output tokens

GLM-5.2131.1K

Pricing

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
GLM-5.2Z.ai

Input

Kimi K3$2.8571/M

Output

Kimi K3$14.2857/M

Cached input

Kimi K3$0.2857/M

Input

GLM-5.2$1.1429/M

Output

GLM-5.2$4/M

Cached input

GLM-5.2$0.2857/M

Capabilities

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
GLM-5.2Z.ai

Reasoning

Kimi K3

Knowledge

Kimi K3n/a

Attachment

Kimi K3

Input modalities

Kimi K3Text, Image

Output modalities

Kimi K3Text

Temperature

Kimi K3

Tool use

Kimi K3

Reasoning

GLM-5.2

Knowledge

GLM-5.2n/a

Attachment

GLM-5.2

Input modalities

GLM-5.2Text

Output modalities

GLM-5.2Text

Temperature

GLM-5.2

Tool use

GLM-5.2

Benchmark

Intelligence

wins

57.1

Kimi K3

51.1

GLM-5.2

Coding

wins

76.2

Kimi K3

68.8

GLM-5.2

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
GLM-5.2Z.ai

Knowledge & Reasoning

GPQA

wins93.5%

HLE

wins44.3%

GPQA

89.5%

HLE

40.1%

Coding

SciCode

wins58.7%

Terminal-Bench Hard

n/a

SciCode

50.5%

Terminal-Bench Hard

wins50.8%

Instruction Following & Agent Tasks

IFBench

n/a

AA-LCR

wins74.7%

Tau2

n/a

IFBench

wins73.3%

AA-LCR

71.3%

Tau2

wins99.1%

FAQ

Which model is better, Kimi K3 or GLM-5.2?+

Kimi K3 and GLM-5.2 should be compared by workload. This page places price, context, output limits, capabilities, and benchmark data side by side. It is also relevant to: kimi k3 vs glm-5.2, kimi k3 vs glm, kimi vs glm.

Is GLM-5.2 cheaper than Kimi K3?+

Use the pricing rows above to compare input, output, and cached input prices for Kimi K3 and GLM-5.2.

Which model supports a longer context length?+

Kimi K3 lists 1M context length, while GLM-5.2 lists 1M.

Can I access both models through TokenHub?+

If both models are available in the TokenHub catalog, you can route requests to Kimi K3 and GLM-5.2 through the TokenHub API.