Z.ai
GLM-5.3-FlashX
Total Context
1M
Max Output
131.1K
Released
N/A
glm-5.2GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship foundation model for long-horizon engineering tasks, agent workflows, and complex reasoning. Its usable 1M-token context window supports project-scale codebases, system documentation, and sustained multi-step execution. Use the GLM API through TokenHub to evaluate current pricing, available endpoints, context limits, and benchmark results for workflows spanning requirements analysis, repository understanding, implementation, testing, and deployment.
Context Window
1M tokens
Maximum Output
131.1K tokens
Release Date
Jun 13, 2026
Modalities
| Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read |
|---|---|---|
| $1.1429/M | $4/M | $0.2857/M |
Reasoning
Tool calling
Temperature parameter
Attachments
Knowledge Base
Endpoint Protocols
GLM-5.2 is an open-weight text model designed for million-token context, long-horizon coding agents and stable delivery of complex software projects.
Maintains useful performance across a one-million-token context so complete projects and extended task histories can remain in one reasoning chain.
Sustains project decomposition, architecture design, implementation, testing, repair and deployment across extended autonomous workflows.
Improved frontend, backend, mobile and deep-debugging capabilities help it follow engineering constraints across complete application workflows.
GLM-5.2 suits end-to-end application delivery, repository-scale engineering and long-running research or optimization tasks.
Turn product requirements into architecture, frontend and backend code, tests, fixes and deployment-ready application artifacts.
Keep an extensive project in context, trace dependencies and implement coordinated changes without losing established engineering constraints.
Run extended cycles of analysis, implementation, measurement and correction for performance engineering or automated research.
curl 'https://us-api.tokenhub.com/v1/messages' \
-X 'POST' \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKENHUB_API_KEY"| Index score | ||
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | Artificial Analysis broad capability aggregate | 51.1 |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Index | Artificial Analysis software task aggregate | 68.8 |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | ||
| GPQA | Advanced science problem solving | 89.5% |
| HLE | Broad expert-level exam set | 40.1% |
| Coding & Engineering | ||
| SciCode | Scientific coding challenges | 50.5% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | Hard terminal task execution | 50.8% |
| Instruction Following & Agent Tasks | ||
| IFBench | Prompt constraint adherence | 73.3% |
| AA-LCR | Long-context reasoning | 71.3% |
| τ²-Bench | Agent workflow tasks | 99.1% |
Metrics sourced from Artificial Analysis
Answers to common questions about the GLM-5.2 API, Z.ai pricing, coding and agent workflows, context limits, and model comparisons on TokenHub.
GLM-5.2 is a Z.ai model designed for long-horizon engineering tasks, complex reasoning, and agent workflows. It is intended for work such as understanding a codebase, planning changes, writing code, testing, and continuing a multi-step task with substantial project context.
GLM-5.2 is a strong candidate when a task requires repository-scale context, repeated tool use, or sustained planning across several steps. Before production use, validate its benchmark results, endpoint support, latency, and tool-calling behavior against your own coding or agent workload.
Create a TokenHub API key, copy the exact GLM-5.2 model ID shown on this page, and select a supported endpoint in the API section. Use the generated request example as the starting point for your OpenAI-compatible or other supported client integration.
Review the current input, output, and cache-read prices displayed on this page, then estimate cost using your typical prompt size, response length, request volume, and cache-hit rate. Long-context and agent workflows can have a very different cost profile from short chat requests.
Check the context length and maximum output values in the model specifications on this page. These limits should be evaluated together: a large context window helps with repositories and documentation, while maximum output determines how much the model can return in one response.
Start with the workload. Evaluate GLM-5.2 for long-running engineering and agent tasks; evaluate DeepSeek V4 Flash when its current price, output limit, and supported endpoints better fit high-throughput text generation or retrieval workflows. Use the comparison page to verify the live specifications before deciding.
There is no universal winner. Compare the two models against the actual task: coding and agent reliability, reasoning quality, context and output limits, pricing, and endpoint compatibility. Run a small evaluation with representative prompts before standardizing a production workflow on either GLM-5.2 or Qwen3.8 Max.
Use one API key to access GLM-5.2 and more AI models through TokenHub.
Media and Discussions
Selected public videos and posts related to this model.
X (Twitter)
Reddit
YouTube