Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Opus 4.7

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview from Google and Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic are shown side by side so you can compare pricing, model IDs, context and output limits, modalities, tool use, release details, and benchmark results where data is available.

Overall Recommendation

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the value and multimodal default: it costs less, supports video and audio, and has a higher Coding Index. Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when its higher overall Intelligence Index and long-running engineering focus matter more.

Recommendation based on Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).

Comparison Highlights

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
Best For
Multimodal reasoninggroundingmulti-step tool use
Advanced engineeringautonomous agentsdifficult knowledge work
How To Read ItUse-case synthesis from model capabilities and positioning.
Workload Fit
MultimodalAgentsGrounding
EngineeringAutonomyEnterprise
How To Read ItThe workloads each model is most directly shaped for.
Input
$2/MEdge
$5/M
How To Read ItLower is better when prompts or retrieval payloads are large.
Output
$12/MEdge
$25/M
How To Read ItLower is better for reasoning-heavy or long-generation traffic.
Context length
1M
1M
How To Read ItHigher is better for repositories, retrieval packs, and transcripts.
Input modalities
Audio, Image, PDF, Text, VideoEdge
Image, PDF, Text
How To Read ItBroader input support reduces the need for separate vision or video models.

Model Selection Guide

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview When

  • A 55.5 Coding Index plus 94.1 GPQA and 44.7 HLE scores in TokenHub
  • $2 input and $12 output per million tokens, with a 1.048M context window
  • The broadest input coverage here: text, image, video, audio, and PDF
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 When

  • A 53.5 Intelligence Index and 52.5 Coding Index in TokenHub’s max-effort profile
  • $5 input and $25 output per million tokens
  • A 1M context window, 128K maximum output, and text, image, and PDF input

Basic Information

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

Name

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Model id

Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewgemini-3.1-pro-preview

Intro

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview is presented as a reliability-focused refinement of Gemini 3 Pro. Google’s preview notes emphasize better thinking, token efficiency, grounding, factuality, software engineering, agentic tool use, and multi-step execution. The preview label matters: it should be described as an advanced but evolving model for teams testing the next Pro behavior.

Author

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle

Released date

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview2026-02-19

Context length

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1M

Max output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview65.5K

Name

Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7

Model id

Claude Opus 4.7claude-opus-4.7

Intro

Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 is described by Anthropic as a strong upgrade for advanced software engineering and difficult long-running tasks. Official messaging highlights the model’s ability to handle complicated work and verify its own outputs. It should be described around sustained engineering judgment rather than generic writing quality.

Author

Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

Released date

Claude Opus 4.72026-04-16

Context length

Claude Opus 4.71M

Max output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7128K

Pricing

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

Input

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$2/M

Output

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$12/M

Cached input

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.2/M

Input

Claude Opus 4.7$5/M

Output

Claude Opus 4.7$25/M

Cached input

Claude Opus 4.7$0.5/M

Capabilities

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

Reasoning

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Knowledge

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview2025-01-01

Attachment

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Input modalities

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewAudio, Image, PDF, Text, Video

Output modalities

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewText

Temperature

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Tool use

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.7

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.72026-01-31

Attachment

Claude Opus 4.7

Input modalities

Claude Opus 4.7Image, PDF, Text

Output modalities

Claude Opus 4.7Text

Temperature

Claude Opus 4.7

Tool use

Claude Opus 4.7

Benchmark

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic

Intelligence

46.5

Coding

wins55.5

Intelligence

wins53.5

Coding

52.5

Knowledge & Reasoning

GPQA

wins94.1%

HLE

wins44.7%

GPQA

91.4%

HLE

39.6%

Coding

SciCode

wins58.9%

Terminal-Bench Hard

wins53.8%

SciCode

54.5%

Terminal-Bench Hard

51.5%

Instruction Following & Agent Tasks

IFBench

wins77.1%

AA-LCR

wins72.7%

Tau2

wins95.6%

IFBench

58.6%

AA-LCR

70.3%

Tau2

88.6%

FAQ

Which model is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Claude Opus 4.7?

+

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Claude Opus 4.7 should be compared by workload. This page places price, context, output limits, capabilities, and benchmark data side by side.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

+

Use the pricing rows above to compare input, output, and cached input prices for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Claude Opus 4.7.

Which model supports a longer context length?

+

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists 1M context length, while Claude Opus 4.7 lists 1M.

Can I access both models through TokenHub?

+

If both models are available in the TokenHub catalog, you can route requests to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Claude Opus 4.7 through the TokenHub API.