Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5

Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI and Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic are shown side by side so you can compare pricing, model IDs, context and output limits, modalities, tool use, release details, and benchmark results where data is available.

Overall Recommendation

Kimi K3 is the stronger value default in TokenHub data, with about 71% lower token prices and a 76.2 Coding Index versus 62.0. Choose Claude Fable 5 when its slightly higher Intelligence Index, PDF input, and long-running project focus matter more.

Comparison Highlights

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Claude Fable 5Anthropic
Best For
Advanced codingmultimodal agentscost-efficient production
Long-running projectsPDF workflowsautonomous knowledge work
How To Read ItUse-case synthesis from model capabilities and positioning.
Workload Fit
CodingMultimodalCost control
Project collaborationKnowledge workPDF
How To Read ItThe workloads each model is most directly shaped for.
Input
$2.8571/MEdge
$10/M
How To Read ItLower is better when prompts or retrieval payloads are large.
Output
$14.2857/MEdge
$50/M
How To Read ItLower is better for reasoning-heavy or long-generation traffic.
Context length
1M
1M
How To Read ItHigher is better for repositories, retrieval packs, and transcripts.
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, PDFEdge
How To Read ItBroader input support reduces the need for separate vision or video models.

Model Selection Guide

Kimi K3Moonshot AI

Choose Kimi K3 When

  • $2.8571 input and $14.2857 output per million tokens, versus $10 and $50
  • A 76.2 Coding Index, compared with 62.0 for Claude Fable 5
  • Text, image, and video input with a 1M-class context window
Claude Fable 5Anthropic

Choose Claude Fable 5 When

  • A 59.9 Intelligence Index, slightly above Kimi K3 at 57.1
  • A 53.3 HLE score, compared with 44.3 for Kimi K3
  • PDF input and a catalog position centered on long-running project work

Basic Information

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Claude Fable 5Anthropic

Name

Kimi K3Kimi K3

Model id

Kimi K3kimi-k3

Intro

Kimi K3Kimi K3 is a high-performance AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, and complex task execution. It delivers strong performance on large-scale programming projects, multi-step problem solving, and knowledge-intensive applications. With broad context handling and multimodal capabilities, K3 is suitable for building powerful AI agents, developer tools, and enterprise-level applications.

Author

Kimi K3Moonshot AI

Released date

Kimi K32026-07-16

Context length

Kimi K31M

Max output tokens

Kimi K3131.1K

Name

Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5

Model id

Claude Fable 5claude-fable-5

Intro

Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 is presented as a Mythos-level Claude model for ambitious, long-running projects. Source pages emphasize autonomous knowledge work, software engineering, vision, memory, and the ability to work for extended periods with sub-agents. Its description should feel more like a project-level collaborator than a short-turn assistant.

Author

Claude Fable 5Anthropic

Released date

Claude Fable 52026-06-09

Context length

Claude Fable 51M

Max output tokens

Claude Fable 5128K

Pricing

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Claude Fable 5Anthropic

Input

Kimi K3$2.8571/M

Output

Kimi K3$14.2857/M

Cached input

Kimi K3$0.2857/M

Input

Claude Fable 5$10/M

Output

Claude Fable 5$50/M

Cached input

Claude Fable 5$1/M

Capabilities

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Claude Fable 5Anthropic

Reasoning

Kimi K3

Knowledge

Kimi K3n/a

Attachment

Kimi K3

Input modalities

Kimi K3Text, Image

Output modalities

Kimi K3Text

Temperature

Kimi K3

Tool use

Kimi K3

Reasoning

Claude Fable 5

Knowledge

Claude Fable 52026-01-31

Attachment

Claude Fable 5

Input modalities

Claude Fable 5Text, Image, PDF

Output modalities

Claude Fable 5Text

Temperature

Claude Fable 5

Tool use

Claude Fable 5

Benchmark

Intelligence

57.1

Kimi K3

wins

59.9

Claude Fable 5

Coding

wins

76.2

Kimi K3

62

Claude Fable 5

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Claude Fable 5Anthropic

Knowledge & Reasoning

GPQA

wins93.5%

HLE

44.3%

GPQA

92.6%

HLE

wins53.3%

Coding

SciCode

58.7%

Terminal-Bench Hard

n/a

SciCode

wins60.2%

Terminal-Bench Hard

wins62.9%

Instruction Following & Agent Tasks

IFBench

n/a

AA-LCR

wins74.7%

Tau2

n/a

IFBench

wins63.5%

AA-LCR

70%

Tau2

wins98.5%

FAQ

Which model is better, Kimi K3 or Claude Fable 5?+

Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5 should be compared by workload. This page places price, context, output limits, capabilities, and benchmark data side by side. It is also relevant to: kimi k3 vs claude fable 5, kimi k3 vs claude, kimi vs claude.

Is Claude Fable 5 cheaper than Kimi K3?+

Use the pricing rows above to compare input, output, and cached input prices for Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5.

Which model supports a longer context length?+

Kimi K3 lists 1M context length, while Claude Fable 5 lists 1M.

Can I access both models through TokenHub?+

If both models are available in the TokenHub catalog, you can route requests to Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5 through the TokenHub API.