OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol
最大上下文
1.1M
最大输出
128K
发布日期
暂无
o3-minio3 Mini 是 OpenAI o 系列推理模型中的高性价比版本。发布资料重点强调科学、数学和代码等 STEM 任务,同时相对大型推理模型具有更低延迟和成本。它适合需要推理能力,但不能承受完整 o 系列模型时间或成本的场景。
上下文窗口
200K Token
最大输出
100K Token
发布日期
2024年12月20日
模态
| 输入价格 | 输出价格 | 缓存读取 |
|---|---|---|
| $1.1/M | $4.4/M | $0.55/M |
推理
工具调用
Temperature 参数
附件
知识库
Endpoint 协议
o3-mini 为目标明确的分析任务提供紧凑型文本推理、长上下文处理和结构化任务执行能力。
以较小模型提供推理能力,适合需要一定分析深度并关注延迟与成本的任务。
支持 200,000 token 上下文窗口,可分析长文本、代码和结构化记录。
可将分析结果整理为一致的数据结构,便于下游系统可靠处理文本任务。
o3-mini 适合政策分析、文本转 SQL 和结构化实体抽取等纯文本推理任务。
阅读长篇政策或规则,依据明确条件评估具体情况并解释判断结果。
将分析问题和数据库结构转换为 SQL 查询,并解释查询逻辑以便审查。
识别大型文本集合中的实体及其关联,生成适合写入图谱或数据库的记录。
import OpenAI from "openai"
const client = new OpenAI({
apiKey: process.env.TOKENHUB_API_KEY,
baseURL: "https://us-api.tokenhub.com/v1",
})
const result = await client.chat.completions.create({})
console.log(result.choices[0]?.message?.content)| 指数分数 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis 综合能力指数 | Artificial Analysis 综合能力评分 | 18.4 |
| Artificial Analysis 代码能力指数 | Artificial Analysis 软件任务评分 | 17.3 |
| 知识与推理 | ||
| MMLU-Pro | 高难度多任务知识评测 | 80.2% |
| GPQA | 高阶科学问题求解 | 77.3% |
| HLE | 广泛专家级考试集合 | 12.3% |
| 代码与工程 | ||
| LiveCodeBench | 近期编程题评测 | 73.4% |
| SciCode | 科学计算代码挑战 | 39.8% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 高难度终端任务执行 | 6.1% |
| 数学能力 | ||
| MATH-500 | 高难度数学解题 | 98.5% |
| AIME | 数学竞赛题 | 86% |
| 指令遵循与 Agent 任务 | ||
| IFBench | 指令约束遵循 | 67.1% |
| AA-LCR | 长上下文推理 | 39.3% |
| τ²-Bench | Agent 工作流任务 | 31.3% |
指标来源 Artificial Analysis
o3 Mini 的能力、适用场景、限制和 TokenHub 使用指南。
o3 Mini 是 OpenAI 面向高性价比的 STEM 和编程推理的模型。
适合数学推理、科学推理、代码推理,尤其适合重视响应速度和成本效率的场景。
核心优势是小型纯文本模型中的强大 STEM 和编程推理。
它已弃用或被后续模型取代,不适合作为新集成的默认选择。 新集成优先用 GPT-5.4 Mini。
请确认是否可用;新集成应使用当前推荐模型。
通过一个 API Key 接入 o3-mini 与更多 AI 模型。
媒体与讨论
精选与此模型相关的公开视频和帖子。
X (Twitter)
OpenAI ·
OpenAI o3-mini is now available in ChatGPT and the API. Pro users will have unlimited access to o3-mini and Plus & Team users will have triple the rate limits (vs o1-mini). Free users can try o3-mini in ChatGPT by selecting the Reason button under the message composer.
查看原文OpenAI ·
OpenAI o3-mini is a powerful and fast reasoning model that is particularly strong in science, math, and coding. https://openai.com/index/openai-o3-mini/
查看原文OpenAI Developers ·
OpenAI o3-mini is now available in the API for developers on tiers 3–5. It comes with a raft of developer features: ⚙️ Function calling 📝 Developer messages 🗂️ Structured Outputs 🧠 Reasoning effort 🌊 Streaming 📦 Batch API support 🤖 Assistants API support
查看原文Reddit
OpenAI o3-mini
WalkThePlankPirate ·
查看原文o3-mini and o3-mini-high are rolling out shortly in ChatGPT
ShreckAndDonkey123 ·
查看原文o3-mini is so good… is AI automation even a job anymore?
Own-Guava11 ·
展开全文
As an automations engineer, among other things, I’ve played around with o3-mini API this weekend, and I’ve had this weird realization: what’s even left to build? I mean, sure, companies have their task-specific flows with vector search, API calling, and prompt chaining to emulate human reasoning/actions—but with how good o3-mini is, and for how cheap, a lot of that just feels unnecessary now. You can throw a massive chunk of context at it with a clear success criterion, and it just gets it right. For example, take all those elaborate RAG systems with semantic search, metadata filtering, graph-based retrieval, etc. Apart from niche cases, do they even make sense anymore? Let’s say you have a knowledge base equivalent to 20,000 pages of text (~10M tokens). Someone asks a question that touches multiple concepts. The maximum effort you might need is extracting entities and running a parallel search… but even that’s probably overkill. If you just do a plain cosine similarity search, cut it down to 100,000 tokens, and feed that into o3-mini, it’ll almost certainly find and use what’s relevant. And as long as that’s true, you’re done—the model does the reasoning. Yeah, you could say that ~$0.10 per query is expensive, or that enterprises need full control over models. But we've all seen how fast prices drop and how open-source catches up. Betting on "it's too expensive" as a reason to avoid simpler approaches seems short-sighted at this point. I’m sure there are lots of situations where this rough picture doesn’t apply, but I suspect that for the majority of small-to-medium-sized companies, it absolutely does. And that makes me wonder is where does that leave tools like Langchain? If you have a model that just works with minimal glue code, why add extra complexity? Sure, some cases still need strict control etc, but for the vast majority of workflows, a single well-formed query to a strong model (with some tool-calling here and there) beats chaining a dozen weaker steps. This shift is super exciting, but also kind of unsettling. The role of a human in automation seems to be shifting from stitching together complex logic, to just conveying a task to a system that kind of just figures things out. Is it just me, or the Singularity is nigh? 😅
YouTube
OpenAI's O3 Mini in 6 Minutes 🚀
Developers Digest
查看原文ChatGPT o3 Mini is here - Best Model I've Ever Tested
Skill Leap AI
查看原文OpenAI O3 Mini: Faster, Smarter, But Is It Better?
Prompt Engineering
查看原文