Gemini 4 Argon
最大コンテキスト
1M
最大出力
65.5K
リリース日
N/A
gemma-4-26b-a4b-itGemma 4 31B は、Google DeepMind の Gemma 4 ファミリーで最も高性能な dense モデルであり、高度な推論、コーディング、マルチモーダル理解、エージェント型ワークフロー向けに設計されています。307 億パラメータと最大 256K トークンのコンテキストウィンドウを備え、テキストと画像の両方を処理しながら、複雑な長文コンテキストのタスクに対応します。ネイティブの関数呼び出しと 140 以上の言語もサポートし、コーディングアシスタント、インテリジェントエージェント、ドキュメント分析、高度な汎用 AI アプリケーションに適した選択肢です。
Context Window
262.1K tokens
Maximum Output
32.8K tokens
Release Date
2026年4月2日
Modalities
| 入力価格 | 出力価格 | キャッシュ読み取り |
|---|---|---|
| $0.15/M | $0.6/M | $0.05/M |
Reasoning
Tool calling
Temperature parameter
Attachments
Knowledge Base
Endpoint Protocols
疎な計算、長いコンテキスト、視覚理解。
総パラメータ数は252億で、トークンごとに38億が有効になります。31Bの密なモデルより計算対象を削減します。
256Kトークンのコンテキストと設定可能な思考モードを組み合わせ、大量の資料を扱うタスクに対応します。
テキストと画像を同時に処理して文章を生成し、MoEモデルで視覚的な推論を行えます。
推論実行の効率を重視する実用的なアシスタント業務。
ソースファイルの説明、変更案の作成、開発者のフィードバックに基づく修正を行うアシスタントを構築できます。
提供されたマニュアル、報告書、検索で取得した文章を基に、質問回答、章の要約、情報比較を行います。
ユーザーの質問とスクリーンショットや文書画像を組み合わせ、見えている内容を説明して回答を作成します。
curl 'https://us-api.tokenhub.com/v1/messages' \
-X 'POST' \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKENHUB_API_KEY"アーキテクチャ、適したタスク、TokenHubでの利用について。
Google DeepMindの指示調整済みMoEモデルです。総パラメータ252億のうち、トークンごとに38億が有効になり、名称では約40億を表す4Bとされています。公開重みはApache 2.0です。
対話型アシスタント、コーディング支援、文書への質問、画像分析に適しています。疎なエキスパートの有効化は効率を重視する選択肢ですが、実際の速度はハードウェアと実行ソフトウェアに依存します。
有効パラメータ数は必要メモリ量とは異なり、重みとコンテキストキャッシュの保存領域も必要です。入力はテキストと画像で、音声の直接入力には対応せず、出力はテキストです。誤りを確認してください。
連携前にTokenHubのアカウントで提供状況、正確なモデルID、エンドポイント、現在の料金を確認し、文書で指定された認証情報とリクエスト形式を使ってください。Apache 2.0は無料APIを保証しません。
実行効率や応答性を重視するなら、まずこのモデルを評価してください。実際の推論・コーディング課題で31Bの密なモデルと比較しましょう。計算量が少なくても同じ品質や安い提供料金が保証されるわけではありません。
1つの API キーで Gemma 4 26B A4B とその他の AI モデルにアクセスできます。
メディアとデモ
公式ガイドとコミュニティの導入例。報告された性能は各実行環境に依存します。
X (Twitter)
Google AI Studio ·
https://t.co/2CJ04Qlfdx
原文を見るAlok ·
Run Gemma 4 26B MoE on 8GB VRAM with 250k context at 20+ tokens/sec If you own any 8GB VRAM graphics card, stop what you are doing. Local AI just had its absolute "Holy Shit" moment for budget hardware. Yesterday, I benchmarked Unsloth Gemma 4 12B Q4_K_XL on an 8GB card. The https://t.co/BsjKxoGvSP
https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/2063581819258462208/img/dOZPZSUHbkHdStS9.jpg原文を見るPrince Canuma ·
Next mlx-vlm release will ship with continuous batching support on the server 🚀 What's coming: → Continuous batching — new requests join the active batch immediately, no waiting. Mixed image + text batches supported → OpenAI-compatible API — field-for-field match with https://t.co/DpdcU8t9az
https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/2044877973635870720/img/qiMR5GOKsqJOGtZ0.jpg原文を見るReddit
Is Gemma 4 31b overkill for a personal assistant/RAG?
vick2djax ·
全文を読む
My main project is an all in one chatbot that focuses on research with a huge RAG and web browsing abilities (I ingest all my books, most of Wiki, all the big data sets for research papers and such). The idea is to have an auditable process that helps me sort through misinformation and basically the garbage that most of the internet has become. I’ve got RSS feeds feeding the RAG daily from places like Reuters to help get past any model’s knowledge cutoff and just have good information come in. But I don’t want it to be a clipping service that just cuts sentences out of pages and glues them together on a new one to make a scrapbook of paragraphs. I want it to take it all as evidence and reason through it. Be able to go back and forth with me as I drill in deeper into a topic. Additionally have it wired up to things like a big memory system to remember all my chats and piece together personal stuff about me so I can better plan things. Hooked into the documentation for my git projects. Etc. 🚨Gemma 4 26b MoE is matching and/or beating the 31b dense on every damn test I come up with🚨 This sub lead me to believe that dense good, moe bad. Moe dumb. I feel like maybe my testing is wrong or something. The responses I get out of the models take turns on giving me the best responses as well. So confusing. Anybody else with the same type of project that has run into the same thing? Do I just take the 2x/3x speed of moe and skip out on the dense? To note, this project isn’t about coding. Zero roleplaying although I do enjoy creative brainstorming on projects. Hardware: solo 3090. I’m able to fit Gemma 4 31b at Q4 cache with 65k+ ctx with QAT & MTP. From what I understand, the QAT is supposed to make the q4 KV not so much of a bad thing for Gemma. QAT UD-Q4_K_XL Note: I was originally using qwen3.6 and had the same issues of 27b getting outperformed by the 35b. I swapped to Gemma as I kept reading it was much better at writing so figured it would make query results easier to read.
Which model to use? Gemma 4 26B A4B or Gemma 4 31B?
Yaniekk ·
全文を読む
Hey everyone! I'm currently working on a cooking web app where users can post their own recipes. I've already integrated the OpenAI Moderations API to filter out unwanted content (such as NSFW, violence, hate speech, etc.). It works great, but now I need a way to evaluate the overall quality of a post. Specifically, I'd like to check whether the recipe makes sense or is just gibberish, whether it's actually about cooking, whether it's complete, whether the attached image matches the recipe, and so on. I was thinking about using an LLM for this, and I found two free models on OpenRouter: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Gemma 4 31B. I'm looking for something that's accurate, reasonably fast, and suitable for this kind of validation in a production app. Which of these models would you recommend? Or is there another free model on OpenRouter that would be a better choice?
Gemma-4-26B-A4B-IT-Q8_0 results with VSCode (long post)
supracode ·
全文を読む
After many rounds of testing, pasting logs into chatgpt, killing my 11 year old ssd (to many log writes finally killed it), I have a pretty good setup working with VSCode. I thought I would share my settings... PC : Intel i7-9700, 32GB DDR4 2666 Ram, Gigabyte H310M-S2H motherboard, ASRock Radeon AI PRO R9700 GPU, Ubuntu 24.04 Llama.cpp server (vulkan) parameters : /app/llama-server -m /models/gemma-264B-8/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-Q8_0.gguf --ctx-size 80000 --threads 7 --gpu-layers 99 --parallel 1 --flash-attn on --batch-size 2048 --ubatch-size 512 --cache-type-k q8_0 --cache-type-v q8_0 --cache-ram 8192 --ctx-checkpoints 3 --mmap --no-mmproj --reasoning off --reasoning-budget 0 --jinja --chat-template-file /models/gemma-264B-8/chat_template.jinja --temp 0.2 --top-k 64 --top-p 0.95 --min-p 0.05 --repeat-penalty 1.15 --presence-penalty 0 Note that I am using the updated chat template posted a week or so back. With this setup my GPU Shows about 83% Vram Used. The --cache-ram 8192 goes to system ram. CPU Usage shown in webmin stays under 10%, and that is when using OpenWebUI on the same box. I get a about 1600 Prompt tps, and 60 tps for response. This can drop a bit as the context grows. VSCode Insiders Edition setup and results I tried to use the continue plugin, and I hated it. I finally found the fix which is this extension : https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=johnny-zhao.oai-compatible-copilot . It allows you to use your local LLM using coPilot (Agent, Plan and Ask all work). r/LocalLLaMA - Model settings in OIA Extension (https://preview.redd.it/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-q8-0-results-with-vscode-long-post-v0-2s7qu9vmgxwg1.png?width=1107&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e766574d527718a1b80016547e93203303392e6) Model settings in OIA Extension r/LocalLLaMA - Advanced model settings in extension (https://preview.redd.it/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-q8-0-results-with-vscode-long-post-v0-csnsdpwtgxwg1.png?width=1091&format=png&auto=webp&s=5c16b43d321b6b1358199409c3da9f7f5c594b14) Advanced model settings in extension I keep the allowable context in vscode below the server setting. The result : I am super impressed. all of the co-pilot features work... code quality is good, and while it does make mistakes i think that is partially my fault for not setting up system prompts, skills, instructions very well (still learning). In use, i create a plan in plan mode and add an instruction to "Keep changes concise and make the plan in small incremental steps" which really helps when it switches to agent mode and doesn't try to change everything at once. It is not perfect by any means... It sometimes gets into loops, or i get tool use exceeded messages. But, while I have been testing my setup I have managed to create a working Asteroids Clone, including tools to generate vector glyphs for the text display in game without writing one line of code (I am a developer btw, but not a game dev): media poster Gameplay I'd love to hear from others who are using a flow like this, get some more tips and help anyone if I can.
YouTube
Gemma-4 26B A4B + vLLM: Best MoE Model of 2026: Running Locally
Fahd Mirza
原文を見るGemma 4 26B A4B: Official Scores vs Our Local Coding Benchmark
Fluid Coding & AI
原文を見るGemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen 3.6 35B A3B - 16GB Local LLM setup
Luke's Dev Lab
原文を見る